|
WSC 2001 Final Abstracts |
General Applications Track
Tuesday 10:30:00 AM 12:00:00 PM
Complex and Interconnected Systems
Chair: Thomas Wiedemann (Technical University of
Berlin)
Optimistic Parallel Simulation of a Large-Scale
View Storage System
Garrett Yaun, Christopher D. Carothers, Sibel
Adali, and David Spooner (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute)
Abstract:
In this paper we present the design and implementation
of a complex view storage system model. Here, a hierarchy of view storage
servers are connected to an array of client-side local disks. The term
view refers to the output or result of a query made on the part of an
application that is executing on a client machine. This model has been
designed for execution with an optimistic simulation engine. One of the
primary drawbacks of this parallel synchronization mechanism has been high
overheads due to state-saving. We attack this problem by implementing the
model using reverse computation. In our performance study of this application,
we find that speedups range from 1.5 to over 5 on 4 processors. Super-linear
speedups are attributed to a slow memory subsystem and the increased
availability of level-1 and level-2 cache when moving to a larger number of
processors.
Towards COTS Distributed Simulation Using
GRIDS
Simon J.E. Taylor, Rajeev Sudra, and Tharumasegaram Janahan
(Brunel University), Gary Tan (National University of Singapore) and John
Ladbrook (Ford Motor Company)
Abstract:
This paper reports on continuing work that concerns
research into the development of a commercial off the shelf (COTS) distributed
simulation environment (federation) using the Generic Runtime Infrastructure
for Distributed Simulation to support the interoperation of simulation
packages such as Arena, Extend, Simul8, Taylor, Witness, etc. The main aim of
this work is to provide the industry with a business benefit from distributed
simulation by making it possible to reuse previously developed models in order
to address different problems within enterprises or between enterprises
(supply chains) that could not otherwise be addressed due to barriers of cost
and time. The approach emphasises transparency and minimal intervention with
the simulation modeller. Two cases are presented: a distributed supply chain
simulation (federation), and an example from the automotive industry.
Simulation of Rare Events in Transportation
Systems
Lori M. Kaufman and Ted C. Giras (University of Virginia)
Abstract:
Prior to the deployment of any new or replacement
component within a transportation system, it should be demonstrated that the
modified system meets or exceeds the safety requirements of the original
system. Since the occurrence of a mishap in such a system is a rare event, it
is neither cost nor time effective to build and to test a prototype in an
actual system prior to deployment. The Axiomatic Safety-Critical Assessment
Process (ASCAP) is a simulation methodology that models the complete system
and analyzes the effects of equipment changes. By carefully constraining the
amount of the overall system state space required for analyses, it
probabilistically determines the sequence of events that lead to mishaps.
ASCAP is applicable to any transportation system that is governed by a
well-defined operational environment.
Tuesday 3:30:00 PM 5:00:00 PM
Healthcare I
Chair: Tillal
Eldabi (Brunel University)
A Discrete-Event Simulation Application for Clinics
Serving the Poor
Christos Alexopoulos and David Goldsman (Georgia
Tech) and John Fontanesi, Mark Sawyer, Michelle De Guire, David Kopald, and
Kathy Holcomb (University of California, San Diego)
Abstract:
Healthcare management operates in an environment of
aggressive pricing, tough competition, and rapidly changing guidelines.
Computer simulation models are increasingly used by large healthcare
institutions to meet these challenges. However, small healthcare facilities
serving the poor are equally in need of meeting these challenges but lack the
finances and personnel required to develop and implement their own simulation
solutions. An academic medical center, healthcare facilities that serve the
poor, and the local public health department formed a unique partnership to
create low-cost tools to meet these challenges. This article describes the
creation of a low-cost, generic, discrete-event simulation model populated by
a workflow observation Excel spreadsheet that can be completed by clinic staff
themselves, thus “customizing” the simulation model for their own purposes.
This initial model focuses on childhood immunization delivery services; the
intent is to develop a tool flexible enough to serve other health services
delivery needs as well.
A Simulation Study of the Labor and Delivery Rooms at
JMH
Martha A. Centeno, Marsha A. Lee, and Elizabeth Lopez (Florida
International University) and Helida R. Fernandez, Manuel Carrillo, and Tom
Ogazon (Jackson Memorial Hospital)
Abstract:
This paper presents a simulation model of the
operations in the Labor and Delivery Rooms at Jackson Memorial Hospital. A
thorough analysis of the contents of hospital’s databases revealed that
although there is a significant amount of data, some of it is not usable.
Nonetheless, with the available data, it was possible to establish relatively
good inputs for the simulation model. Furthermore, it was possible to do a
correlation analysis to determine which factors affect the procedure service
times in the OR and Recovery areas. The simulation model has yielded results
to improve doctor scheduling and better staffing levels.
The Use of Simulation for Process Improvement at an
Ambulatory Surgery Center
Francisco J. Ramis, Jorge L. Palma, and
Felipe F. Baesler (Universidad del BioBio)
Abstract:
This work has for objective building a simulation model
to evaluate different alternatives of operation of a projected center for
ambulatory surgery. For the construction of the model a group of pathologies
was selected and real data was taken from statistics of surgeries from a
clinical hospital. The information was supplemented by the opinion of medical
surgeons and expert anesthesiologists. Similarly, the model was validated by
means of the opinion of experts and implemented with the Arena simulation
software. Different configurations of operating conditions were studied. It is
concluded that the maximum throughput of daily surgeries is achieved, 10 in
total, dedicating two beds to preparation of patient, five beds to the
transitory hospitalization and using an LPT scheduling rule in the operating
rooms, i.e., the heaviest surgeries first.
Wednesday 8:30:00 AM 10:00:00 AM
Healthcare II
Chair:
Francisco Ramis (Universidad del Bio-Bio)
Multi-Objective Simulation Optimization for a Cancer
Treatment Center
Felipe F. Baesler (Universidad del BioBio) and
José A. Sepúlveda (University of Central Florida)
Abstract:
This paper presents a case study application of a
cancer treatment center facility. A simulation model was created and
integrated to a multi-objective optimization heuristic developed by the
authors with the purpose of finding the best combination of control variables
that optimize the performance of four different objectives related to the
system. The results obtained show that the implementation of the proposed
solution could improve the four objectives in comparison to the existing
solution.
A Proposed Approach for Modeling Healthcare Systems
for Understanding
Tillal Eldabi and Ray J. Paul (Brunel University)
Abstract:
The use of simulation in healthcare area is not widely
spread when compared with other areas. This paper suggests that traditional
approaches to modeling may not fully utilize simulation for tackling
healthcare problems. Healthcare systems are often complex with multiple
decision makers. A modeling approach is proposed in this paper to enhance
stakeholders’ understanding and intercommunications. The structure of this
approach is participative including the stakeholders. The behavior of the
approach is iterative rather than step-based. An example is given showing how
this approach is used for facilitating the modeling process. It is found that
involving stakeholders throughout the modeling process helps them understand
their problem coupled with more appreciation to findings from the model. This
process is also found useful in enhancing stakeholders’ intercommunication.
Using Monte Carlo Simulation to Assess the Value of
Combination Vaccines for Pediatric Immunization
Sheldon H. Jacobson
(University of Illinois), Edward C. Sewell (Southern Illinois University
Edwardsville) and Bruce G. Weniger (Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention)
Abstract:
Research by vaccine manufacturers has resulted in the
development of new vaccines that protect against a number of diseases. This
has created a dilemma for how to introduce such new vaccines into an already
crowded Recommended Childhood Immunization Schedule and prompted the
development of vaccine products that combine several individual vaccines into
a single injection. Such combination vaccines permit new vaccines to be
inserted into the immunization schedule without exposing children to an
unacceptable number of injections during a single clinic visit. This paper
describes a Monte Carlo simulation with an integer programming model to assess
and quantify the distributions around inclusion prices which reflect the
economic premium of these new combinations. Each new vaccine competed against
existing vaccines for six childhood diseases (hepatitis B, diphtheria,
tetanus, pertussis, Haemophilus influenzae type b, and polio) at their March
2000 Federal contract discount prices.
Wednesday 10:30:00 AM 12:00:00 PM
Simulation Practice
Chair:
Boonserm Kulvatunyou (Penn State University)
Key Enablers in the Development of
Simulation
Stephen P. Murphy and Terrence D. Perera (Sheffield
Hallam University)
Abstract:
The awareness of simulation technologies within the UK
is relatively small when compared with the USA. Subsequently several large US
companies have been able to overcome the difficulties in adopting new
technology into their business and introduce simulation. This paper
investigates the problems encountered and the practices helping to
successfully implement simulation into a company environment. Details of a
major survey conducted to determine the approaches taken by large automotive
and aerospace companies within these two countries are outlined. The survey
highlighted differences in the development of simulation within twelve large
companies, the extent of the difference and the reasons why these differences
exist.
Call Center Scheduling Technology Evaluation Using
Simulation
Sandeep Gulati and Scott A. Malcolm (University of
Delaware)
Abstract:
Telemarketers, direct marketing agencies, collection
agencies and others whose primary means of customer contact is via the
telephone invest considerable sums of money to make the calling operation
efficient and productive. Investments are required in human resources,
infrastructure and technology. Having invested the dollars, businesses want to
ensure that value is maximized. Call scheduling algorithms provide an
efficient method to maximize customer contact. However, management at a large,
national credit card bank was not convinced that the software used to schedule
calls was providing an adequate level of service. Simulation studies showed
that management was justified in this assumption. The study also revealed that
process improvement opportunities exist, which if implemented would likely
produce the desired performance improvements.
Choosing Among Seven Bases
Stuart
Gittlitz (S & G Simulations)
Abstract:
In this paper, the selection of a BASE Case was every
bit as important as the simulation itself. The production team had been
familiar with simulations and had used their results on previous projects. The
team was concerned with the design of additional capacity for a current
production line along with their ability to gain approval for the proposed
project. They knew that simulation could be the basis for their decisions. But
first they had to ask the right questions. This production line, at a major
food manufacturer, had been simulated and reviewed. Since the original
simulation, it was noted that the Cartoner speed and overall efficiency had
been stated at too high a level. New simulations were required to support the
project. While 88% efficiency had been used in the prior simulation, the
historical efficiency was only at 60%. But that level of productivity would be
considered unacceptable as a BASE to request the purchase of additional
equipment.