|
WSC 2002 Final Abstracts |
Introductory Tutorials Track
Monday 10:30:00 AM 12:00:00 PM
Introduction to Simulation
Chair: Doug Morrice (University of Texas)
Introduction to Simulation
Ricki G.
Ingalls (Oklahoma State University)
Abstract:
Simulation is a powerful tool if understood and used
properly. This introduction to simulation tutorial is designed to teach the
basics of simulation, including structure, function, data generated, and its
proper use. The introduction starts with a definition of simulation, goes
through a talk about what makes up a simulation, how the simulation actually
works, and how to handle data generated by the simulation. Throughout the
paper, there is discussion on issues concerning the use of simulation in
industry.
Monday 1:30:00 PM 3:00:00 PM
Spreadsheet Simulation
Chair:
Andy Seila (University of Georgia)
Spreadsheet Simulation
Andrew F. Seila
(University of Georgia)
Abstract:
"Spreadsheet simulation" refers to the use of a
spreadsheet as a platform for representing simulation models and performing
the simulation experiment. This tutorial explains the reasons for using this
platform for simulation, discusses why this is frequently an efficient way to
build simulation models and execute them, describes how to setup a spreadsheet
simulation, and finally examines when a spreadsheet is not an appropriate
platform for simulation.
Monday 3:30:00 PM 5:00:00 PM
Output Analysis
Chair: Marvin
Nakayama (New Jersey Institute of Technology)
Simulation Output Analysis
Marvin K.
Nakayama (New Jersey Institute of Technology)
Abstract:
We discuss methods for statistically analyzing the
output from stochastic simulations. Both terminating and steady-state
simulations are considered.
Tuesday 8:30:00 AM 10:00:00 AM
Input Modeling
Chair: Barry
Nelson (Northwestern University)
Answers to the Top Ten Input Modeling
Questions
Bahar Biller (Carnegie Mellon University) and Barry L.
Nelson (Northwestern University)
Abstract:
In this tutorial we provide answers to the top ten
input-modeling questions that new simulation users ask, point out common
mistakes that occur and give relevant references. We assume that commercial
input-modeling software will be used when possible, and only suggest
non-commercial options when there is little else available. Detailed examples
will be provided in the tutorial presentation.
Tuesday 10:30:00 AM 12:00:00 PM
Simulation Optimization
Chair:
Chuck Reilly (University of Central Florida)
Simulation-Based Optimization
Averill M. Law
and Michael G. McComas (Averill M. Law & Associates)
Abstract:
In this tutorial we present an introduction to
simulation-based optimization, which is, perhaps, the most important new
simulation technology in the last five years. We give a precise statement of
the problem being addressed and also experimental results for two commercial
optimization packages applied to a manufacturing example with seven decision
variables.
Tuesday 1:30:00 PM 3:00:00 PM
Simulation Experiments
Chair:
Russell Barton (The Pennsylvania State University)
Designing Simulation Experiments
Russell
R. Barton (The Pennsylvania State University)
Abstract:
Simulation models are useful for examining the
performance of alternative system configurations and/or alternative operating
procedures for a system. This tutorial provides some techniques for planning a
set of simulation model runs, in order to gain insight on system behavior.
There is an emphasis on graphical methods for planning the experiment and
displaying the results.
Tuesday 3:30:00 PM 5:00:00 PM
Verification and Validation
Chair: John Carson (Brooks-PRI Automation)
Model Verification and Validation
John S.
Carson, II (Brooks-PRI Automation)
Abstract:
In this paper we outline practical techniques and
guidelines for verifying and validating simulation models. The goal of
verification and validation is a model that is accurate when used to predict
the performance of the real-world system that it represents, or to predict the
difference in performance between two scenarios or two model configurations.
The process of verifying and validating a model should also lead to improving
a model’s credibility with decision makers. We provide examples of a number of
typical situations where model developers may make inappropriate or inaccurate
assumptions, and offer guidelines and techniques for carrying out verification
and validation.
Wednesday 8:30:00 AM 10:00:00 AM
Supply Chain Analysis
Chair:
Leonardo Chwif (Simulate)
Supply Chain Analysis: Spreadsheet or
Simulation?
Leonardo Chwif (Simulate), Marcos Ribeiro Pereira
Barretto (Mechatronics Lab) and Eduardo Saliby (Cel-Coppead)
Abstract:
In the last few decades, a lot of company effort has
been spent in the optimization of internal efficiency, aiming at cost
reduction and competitiveness. Especially over the last decade, there has been
a consensus that not only the company, but the whole supply chain in which it
fits, is responsible for the success or failure of any business. Therefore,
supply chain analysis tools and methodologies have become more and more
important. From all tools, spreadsheets are by far the most widely used
technique for scenario analysis. Other techniques such as optimization,
simulation or both (simulation-optimization) are alternatives for in-depth
analysis. While spreadsheet-based analysis is mainly a static-deterministic
approach, simulation is a dynamic-stochastic tool. The purpose of this paper
is to compare spreadsheet-based and simulation-based tools showing the impact
of using these two different approaches on the analysis of a real (yet
simplified) supply chain case study.
Wednesday 10:30:00 AM 12:00:00 PM
Software Evaluation and
Selection
Chair: Tamrat Tewoldeberhan (Delft University of Technology
)
An Evaluation and Selection Methodology for
Discrete-Event Simulation Software
Tamrat W. Tewoldeberhan,
Alexander Verbraeck, and Edwin Valentin (Delft University of Technology) and
Gilles Bardonnet (Accenture)
Abstract:
For large international companies with their own
simulation team it is often hard to select new discrete event simulation
software. Often, preferences and application areas between countries differ,
and simulation software already in use influences the outcome of the selection
process. Available selection methods do not suffice in such cases. Therefore,
a two-phase evaluation and selection methodology is proposed. Phase one
quickly reduces the long list to a short list of packages. Phase two matches
the requirements of the company with the features of the simulation package in
detail. Different methods are used for a detailed evaluation of each package.
Simulation software vendors participate in both phases. The approach was
tested for the Accenture world-wide simulation team. After the study, we can
conclude that the methodology was effective in terms of quality and efficient
in terms of time. It can easily be applied for other large organizations with
a team of simulation specialists.