  | 
    
      WSC 2003 Final Abstracts  | 
 
Monday 10:30:00 AM 12:00:00 PM 
State of the Art Tutorial I: Simulation 
Modeling for Finance and Insurance 
Chair: Perwez Shahabuddin (Columbia 
University)
  Applications of Simulation Models in Finance and 
  Insurance
Thomas N. Herzog (U.S. Department of Housing & Urban 
  Development) and Graham Lord (Princeton University)
  
Abstract:
We describe a number of applications of simulation 
  methods to practical problems in finance and insurance. The first entails the 
  simulation of a two-stage model of a property-casualty insurance operation. 
  The second application simulates the operation of an insurance regime for home 
  equity conversion mortgages (also known as reverse mortgages). The third is an 
  application of simulation in the context of Value at Risk, a widely-used 
  measure for assessing the performance of portfolios of assets and/or 
  liabilities. We conclude with an application of simulation in the testing of 
  the efficient market hypothesis of the U.S. stock 
  market.
  
Monday 1:30:00 PM 3:00:00 PM 
State of the Art Tutorial II: Simulations 
for Financial Engineering 
Chair: William Morokoff (Moody's KMV)
  Efficient Simulations for Option 
  Pricing
Jeremy Staum (Northwestern University)
  
Abstract:
This paper presents an overview of techniques for 
  improving the efficiency of option pricing simulations, including quasi-Monte 
  Carlo methods, variance reduction, and methods for dealing with discretization 
  error. 
  
Monday 3:30:00 PM 5:00:00 PM 
New Simulation Methodology for Risk 
Analysis 
Chair: Jeremy Staum (Cornell 
University)
  Importance Sampling for a Mixed Poisson Model 
  of Portfolio Credit Risk
Paul Glasserman and Jingyi Li (Columbia 
  University)
  
Abstract:
Simulation is widely used to estimate losses due to 
  default and other credit events in financial portfolios. The challenge in 
  doing this efficiently results from (i) rare-event aspects of large losses and 
  (ii) complex dependence between defaults of multiple obligors. We discuss 
  importance sampling techniques to address this problem in two portfolio credit 
  risk models developed in the financial industry, with particular emphasis on a 
  mixed Poisson model. We give conditions for asymptotic optimality of the 
  estimators as the portfolio size grows. 
  
Rare-Event, Heavy-Tailed Simulations Using 
  Hazard Function Transformations, with Applications to 
  Value-at-Risk
Zhi Huang and Perwez Shahabuddin (Columbia 
University)
  
Abstract:
We develop an observation that a simulation method 
  introduced recently for heavy-tailed stochastic simulation, namely hazard-rate 
  twisting, is equivalent to doing exponential twisting on a transformed version 
  of the heavy-tailed random-variable; the transforming function is the hazard 
  function. Using this approach, the paper develops efficient methods for 
  computing portfolio value-at-risk (VAR) when changes in the underlying risk 
  factors have the multivariate Laplace distribution. 
  
Genetic Programming with Monte Carlo 
  Simulation for Option Pricing
N. K. Chidambaran (Rutgers 
University)
  
Abstract:
I examine the role of programming parameters in 
  determining the accuracy of Genetic Programming for option pricing. I use 
  Monte Carlo simulations to generate stock and option price data needed to 
  develop a Genetic Option Pricing Program. I simulate data for two different 
  stock price processes – a Geometric Brownian process and a Jump-Diffusion 
  process. In the jump-diffusion setting, I seed the Genetic Program with the 
  Black-Scholes equation as a starting approximation. I find that population 
  size, fitness criteria, and the ability to seed the program with known 
  analytical equations, are important determinants of the efficiency of Genetic 
  Programming. 
  
Tuesday 8:30:00 AM 10:00:00 AM 
Risk Analysis Software Tutorial I 
Chair: Paul Na (Bayerische Landesbank New York)
  Crystal Ball for Six Sigma 
  Tutorial
Lawrence I. Goldman and Ethan Evans-Hilton 
  (Decisioneering, Inc.) and Hilary Emmett (Decisioneering (UK) Ltd.)
  
Abstract:
In an increasingly competitive market, businesses are 
  turning to new practices like Six Sigma, a structured methodology for 
  accelerated process improvement, to help reduce costs and increase efficiency. 
  Monte Carlo simulation can help Six Sigma practitioners understand the 
  variation inherent in a process or product, and in turn, can be used to 
  identify and test potential improvements. The benefits of understanding and 
  controlling the sources of variability include increased productivity, reduced 
  waste, and sales driven through improved customer satisfaction. This tutorial 
  uses Crystal Ball® Professional Edition, a suite of easy-to-use Microsoft 
  Excel add-in software, to demonstrate how stochastic simulation and 
  optimization can be used in a Six Sigma analysis of a technical support call 
  center. 
  
Tuesday 10:30:00 AM 12:00:00 PM 
Risk Analysis Software Tutorial II 
Chair: John Charnes (University of Kansas)
  OptFolio … A Simulation Optimization System for 
  Project Portfolio Planning
Jay April, Fred Glover, and James P. 
  Kelly (OptTek Systems, Inc.)
  
Abstract:
OptFolio is a new portfolio optimization software 
  system simultaneously addresses financial return goals, catastrophic loss 
  avoidance, and performance probability. The innovations embedded in the system 
  enable users to confidently design effective plans for achieving financial 
  goals, employing accurate analysis based on real data. State-of-the-art 
  technology integrates simulation and metaheuristic optimization techniques and 
  a new surface methodology based on linear programming into a global system 
  that guides a series of evaluations to reveal truly optimal investment 
  scenarios. Portfolio analysis tools are designed to aid senior management in 
  the development and analysis of portfolio strategies, by giving them the 
  capability to assess the impact on the corporation of various investment 
  decisions. In this paper we will present new techniques that increase the 
  flexibility of optimization tools and deepen the types of portfolio analysis 
  that can be carried out. We include examples applied to energy, 
  pharmaceutical, and information technology portfolios. 
  
  
Tuesday 1:30:00 PM 3:00:00 PM 
New Simulation Methodology for 
Finance 
Chair: Athanassios Avramidis (University of Montreal)
  Work Reduction in Financial 
  Simulations
Jeremy Staum (Northwestern University) and Samuel 
  Ehrlichman and Vadim Lesnevski (Cornell University)
  
Abstract:
We investigate the possibility of efficiency gains from 
  schemes that reduce the expected cost of a simulated path, which allows more 
  paths given a fixed computational budget. Many such schemes impart bias, so we 
  look at the bias-variance tradeoff in terms of mean squared error. The work 
  reduction schemes we consider are fast numerical evaluation of functions, such 
  as the exponential, as well as changes to simulation structure and sampling 
  schemes. The latter include descriptive sampling, reducing the number of time 
  steps, and dispensing with some factors in a multi-factor simulation. In 
  simulations where computational budgets are tightly constrained, such as risk 
  management and calibration of financial models, using cheaper, less accurate 
  algorithms can reduce mean squared error. 
  
Efficient Simulation of Gamma and 
  Variance-Gamma Processes
Athanassios N. Avramidis, Pierre L'Ecuyer, 
  and Pierre-Alexandre Tremblay (University of Montreal)
  
Abstract:
We study algorithms for sampling discrete-time paths of 
  a gamma process and a variance-gamma process, defined as a Brownian process 
  with random time change obeying a gamma process. The attractive feature of the 
  algorithms is that increments of the processes over longer time scales are 
  assigned to the first sampling coordinates. The algorithms are based on having 
  in explicit form the process' conditional distributions, are similar in spirit 
  to the Brownian bridge sampling algorithms proposed for financial Monte Carlo, 
  and synergize with quasi-Monte Carlo techniques for efficiency improvement. We 
  compare the variance and efficiency of ordinary Monte Carlo and quasi-Monte 
  Carlo for an example of financial option pricing with the variance-gamma 
  model. 
  
Duality Theory and Simulation in Financial 
  Engineering
Martin B. Haugh (Columbia University)
  
Abstract:
This paper presents a brief introduction to the use of 
  duality theory and simulation in financial engineering. It focuses on American 
  option pricing and portfolio optimization problems when the underlying state 
  space is high-dimensional. In general, it is not possible to solve these 
  problems exactly due to the so-called ``curse of dimensionality'' and as a 
  result, approximate solution techniques are required. Approximate dynamic 
  programming (ADP) and dual based methods have recently been proposed for 
  constructing and evaluating good approximate solutions to these problems. In 
  this paper we describe these ADP and dual-based methods, and the role 
  simulation plays in each of them. Some directions for future research are also 
  outlined. 
  
Tuesday 3:30:00 PM 5:00:00 PM 
Simulation Methodology for 
Collateralized Debt and Real Options 
Chair: Tarja Joro (University of 
Alberta)
  Simulation Methods for Risk Analysis of 
  Collateralized Debt Obligations
William J. Morokoff (Moody's KMV)
  
Abstract:
Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs) are 
  sophisticated financial products that offer a range of investments, known as 
  tranches, at varying risk levels backed by a collateral pool typically 
  consisting of corporate debt (bonds, loans, default swaps, etc.). The analysis 
  of the risk-return properties of CDO tranches is complicated by the highly 
  non-linear and time dependent relationship between the cash flows to the 
  tranche and the underlying collateral performance. This paper describes a 
  multiple time step simulation approach that tracks cash flows over the life of 
  a CDO deal to determine the risk characteristics of CDO tranches. 
  
Simulation and Optimization for Real Options 
  Valuation
Barry R. Cobb and John M. Charnes (The University of 
  Kansas)
  
Abstract:
Real options valuation (ROV) considers the managerial 
  flexibility to make ongoing decisions regarding implementation of investment 
  projects and deployment of real assets. This paper introduces a 
  simulation-optimization approach to valuing real investment options based on a 
  model containing several decision variables and realistic stochastic inputs. 
  Using this approach, the value of a portfolio of real investment projects is 
  determined by maximizing the mean discounted cash flows calculated by the 
  model over many combinations of the decision variables. This yields an optimal 
  decision rule that significantly increases the value extracted from the 
  investment projects in comparison to arbitrary decision rules. 
  
A New Methodology to Evaluate the Real Options of an 
  Investment Using Binomial Trees and Monte Carlo Simulation
Michele 
  Amico (University of Palermo), Zbigniew J. Pasek and Farshid Asl (University 
  of Michigan) and Giovanni Perrone (University of Basilicata)
  
Abstract:
This paper deals with a new methodology to evaluate the 
  real operating options embedded in a manufacturing system investment. In a 
  single product framework, the demand is assumed as the main source of 
  uncertainty, therefore as a stochastic variable following a Geometric Brownian 
  Motion (GBM). Then, focusing on the real option to expand the capacity at a 
  certain time in the future, we have developed a new approach for the option 
  payoff, looking forward in the time interval from the expansion date to the 
  end of the planning horizon. The payoff function is the expected Net Present 
  Value (NPV), at the expansion date, of the additional investment to increase 
  the capacity, and it is calculated using Monte Carlo simulation. The option 
  value is computed with a binomial tree algorithm. A numerical example and a 
  sensitivity analysis of the option value as a function of some parameters are 
  finally presented. 
  
Wednesday 8:30:00 AM 10:00:00 AM 
Simulation for Risk Management 
Chair: Aparna Gupta (Rensselaer Polytechnic 
Institute)
  A Simulation-Based Credit Default Swap Pricing 
  Approach Under Jump-Diffusion
Tarja Joro (University of Alberta) 
  and Paul Na (Bayerische Landesbank New York Branch)
  
Abstract:
Diffusion-based Credit Default Swap (CDS) pricing 
  models produce zero spreads for very short-term contracts, which contradict 
  empirical data. We introduce a simulation-based CDS pricing approach that 
  avoids the zero short-term spreads problem through a jump-diffusion process. 
  
Risk Management of a P/C Insurance Company Scenario 
  Generation, Simulation and Optimization
John M. Mulvey and Hafize 
  Gaye Erkan (Princeton University)
  
Abstract:
A large conglomerate such as a property/casualty 
  insurance firm in this case, can be divided along business boundaries. This 
  division might be along commercial lines, homeowner lines and perhaps across 
  countries. An insurance firm’s capital can be interpreted as a buffer that 
  protects the company from insolvency and its inability to pay policyholder 
  losses. Rare events have been simulated over the two divisions of an insurance 
  firm. Different risk measures like conditional value at risk (CVaR) have been 
  implemented into the optimization model. Decomposition methods will be applied 
  in the context of decentralized decision making of a multi-divisional firm. 
  
A Two-Component Spot Pricing Framework for 
  Loss-Rate Guaranteed Internet Service Contracts
Aparna Gupta, 
  Lingyi Zhang, and Shivkumar Kalyanaraman (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute)
  
Abstract:
The technological advances in recent years are allowing 
  Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to provide Quality of Service (QoS) 
  assurance for traffic through their domains. This article develops a spot 
  pricing framework for intra-domain expected bandwidth contract with a loss 
  based QoS guarantee. The framework accounts for both the cost and the risks 
  associated with QoS delivery. A nonlinear pricing scheme is used in pricing 
  for cost recovery; a utility based options pricing approach is developed for 
  risk related pricing. The application of options pricing in Internet services 
  provides a mechanism for fair risk sharing between the provider and the 
  customer, and may be extended to price other uncertainties in QoS guarantees. 
  
![]()