|
WSC 2007 Final Abstracts |
Monday 1:30:00 PM 3:00:00 PM
Inside Discrete-Event Simulation
Software
Chair: Jerry Banks (Independent
Consultant)
Inside Discrete-event Simulation Software: How
it Works and Why it Matters
Thomas J. Schriber (University of
Michigan) and Daniel T. Brunner (Kiva Systems Incorporated)
Abstract:
This paper provides simulation practitioners and
consumers with a grounding in how discrete-event simulation software works.
Topics include discrete-event systems; entities, resources, control elements
and operations; simulation runs; entity states; entity lists; and entity-list
management. The implementation of these generic ideas in AutoMod, SLX, and
Extend is described. The paper concludes with several examples of “why it
matters” for modelers to know how their simulation software works, including
coverage of SIMAN (Arena), ProModel, and GPSS/H as well as the other three
tools.
Monday 3:30:00 PM 5:00:00 PM
Verification and Validation
Chair: Enver Yucesan (INSEAD)
Verification and Validation of Simulation
Models
Robert G. Sargent (Syracuse University)
Abstract:
In this paper we discuss verification and validation of
simulation models. Four different approaches to deciding model validity are
described; two different paradigms that relate verification and validation to
the model development process are presented; various validation techniques are
defined; conceptual model validity, model verification, operational validity,
and data validity are discussed; a way to document results is given; a
recommended procedure for model validation is presented; and model
accreditation is briefly discussed.
Tuesday 8:30:00 AM 10:00:00 AM
Multi-Agent Simulation
Chair:
Sanjay Jain (The George Washington University)
Defense and Homeland Security Applications of
Multi-agent Simulations
Thomas W. Lucas and Susan M. Sanchez (Naval
Postgraduate School), Felix Martinez (Centro de Estudios Superiores Navales),
Lisa R. Sickinger (USS Laboon (DDG-58)) and Jonathan W. Roginski (United
States Military Academy)
Abstract:
Department of Defense and Homeland Security analysts
are increasingly using multi-agent simulation (MAS) to examine national
security issues. This paper summarizes three MAS national security studies
conducted at the Naval Postgraduate School. The first example explores
equipment and employment options for protecting critical infrastructure. The
second case considers non-lethal weapons within the spectrum of
force-protection options in a maritime environment. The final application
investigates emergency (police, fire, and medical) responses to an urban
terrorist attack. There are many potentially influential factors and many
sources of uncertainty associated with each of these simulated scenarios.
Thus, efficient experimental designs and computing clusters are used to enable
us to explore many thousands of computational experiments, while
simultaneously varying many factors. The results illustrate how MAS
experiments can provide valuable insights into defense and homeland security
operations.
Tuesday 10:30:00 AM 12:00:00 PM
Statistical Analysis: State of the
Art
Chair: Loo Hay Lee (National University of Singapore)
Statistical Analysis of Simulation Output:
State of the Art
Christos Alexopoulos (Georgia Institute of
Technology)
Abstract:
This paper reviews statistical methods for analyzing
output data from computer simulations. Specifically, it focuses on the
estimation of steady-state system parameters. The estimation techniques
include the replication/deletion approach, the regenerative method, the batch
means method, and methods based on standardized time series.
Tuesday 1:30:00 PM 3:00:00 PM
Ranking and Selection
Chair: E.
Chen (BASF Corporation)
Recent Advances in Ranking and
Selection
Seong-Hee Kim (Georgia Institute of Technology) and Barry
L. Nelson (Northwestern University)
Abstract:
This tutorial provides an overview on recent advances
made in ranking and selection (R&S) for selecting the best simulated
system and discusses challenges that still exist in the field. We focus on
indifference-zone R&S procedures that provide a guaranteed probability of
correct selection when the best system is at least a user-specified amount
better than the other systems.
Tuesday 3:30:00 PM 5:00:00 PM
Real Options Valuation
Chair:
Jeff Hong (Hong Kong University of Science and
Technology)
Real Options Valuation
Barry R. Cobb
(Virginia Military Institute) and John M. Charnes (The University of Kansas)
Abstract:
Managerial flexibility has value. The ability of their
managers to make smart decisions in the face of volatile market and
technological conditions is essential for firms any competitive industry. This
advanced tutorial describes the use of Monte Carlo simulation and stochastic
optimization for the valuation of real options that arise from the abilities
of managers to influence the cash flows of the projects under their control.
Option pricing theory supplements discounted cash flow methods of valuation by
considering managerial flexibility. Managers' options to take actions that
affect real investment projects are comparable to options on the sale or
purchase of financial assets. Just as a financial option derives its value
from the the price movements of the underlying financial asset, a real option
derives its value from the fluctuations of the cash flows generating the value
of the investment project.
Wednesday 8:30:00 AM 10:00:00 AM
Regression Models and Experiment
Designs
Chair: Kathryn Hoad (University of Southampton)
Regression Models and Experimental Designs: A
Tutorial for Simulation Analysts
Jack P. C. Kleijnen (Tilburg
University)
Abstract:
This tutorial explains the basics of linear regression
metamodels - especially low-order polynomials - and the corresponding
statistical designs---namely, fractional factorial designs of resolution III
(Plackett-Burman designs), IV (accounting for interactions), V (estimating
individual interactions), and Central Composite Designs (CCDs, for
second-order polynomial metamodels). This tutorial assumes `white noise',
which means that the residuals of the fitted linear regression metamodel are
normally, independently, and identically distributed with zero mean. This
metamodel requires validation. The tutorial gathers statistical results that
are scattered throughout the literature on mathematical statistics, and
presents these results in a form that is understandable to simulation
analysts.
Wednesday 10:30:00 AM 12:00:00 PM
Tackling the Right Problem: Hard and
Soft Methods
Chair: Stewart Robinson (University of Warwick)
Making Sure You Tackle the Right Problem: Linking
Hard and Soft Methods in Simulation Practice
Michael Pidd
(Lancaster University Management School)
Abstract:
As well as knowledge of computing, statistics and
modelling, a successful simulation analyst needs to develop ways to understand
the important features of an application domain. The last two decades have
seen the increasing use of ‘soft’ approaches to help analysts structure the
problems they are asked to tackle. The idea is to help ensure that the right
problem is tackled. The complementary use of these problem structuring
approaches with the technical side of computer simulation offers the prospect
of better simulation practice. This advanced tutorial introduces some of these
structuring approaches and discusses how they can be used in simulation
projects, paying attention to the different ways in which simulation models
are used.