|
WSC 2007 Final Abstracts |
Simulation Interoperability Track
Tuesday 3:30:00 PM 5:00:00 PM
Panel: Distributed Simulation in
Industry
Chair: Peter Lendermann (D-SIMLAB Technologies)
Panel: Distributed Simulation in Industry - a
Real-world Necessity or Ivory Tower Fancy?
Peter Lendermann
(D-SIMLAB Technologies), Leon F. McGinnis (Georgia Institute of Technology),
Charles R. McLean (National Institute of Standards and Technology), Simon
Taylor (Brunel University), Matthias Heinicke (Unigraphics Solutions GmbH) and
Steffen Strassburger (Technical University of Ilmenau)
Abstract:
Distributed simulation has a long history at the Winter
Simulation Conference. Although successful in the military domain it appears,
however, that the idea of applying distributed simulation in other fields for
modeling and analysis of large-scale, heterogeneous systems such as
communication networks or supply chains has still not reached the stage of
commercial use until today. This panel attempts to identify reasons for this
phenomenon by debating whether distributed simulation is actually a real-world
necessity or should rather be considered ivory tower fancy.
Wednesday 8:30:00 AM 10:00:00 AM
Ontology-Based Interoperability I
Chair: Perakath Benjamin (Knowledge Based Systems)
Representation and Simulation of Stochastic Petri
Net Models Using xPNML
Hyunsoo Lee, Bikram Sharda, and Amarnath
Banerjee (Texas A&M University)
Abstract:
The paper presents an extensible Petri Net Markup
Language (xPNML), which is an extended version of PNML. The xPNML format
overcomes limitations associated with PNML structure for simulation and
analysis of stochastic Petri nets. In addition, the proposed format supports
modular concepts for creating specific models (for example, a module for
machine operation including working, failed and repair states). These modules
can be used as templates and exchanged among different net models. The paper
provides the ontology of xPNML model and overview of its JAVA based
implementation for simulation and analysis of stochastic Petri nets.
Simulation-based, Ontology Driven Resource Plan
Development
Frank Boydstun (Tinker Air Force Base) and Mike Graul,
Perakath Benjamin, and Arthur Keen (Knowledge Based Systems, Inc.)
Abstract:
This paper describes the use of a planning ontology of
the domain of Aircraft Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul [MRO] at a USAF depot
to produce a discrete event simulation model of the aircraft ramp. The ramp is
a very flexible, critical, shared resource for aircraft production. The “found
work” variability inherent in the MRO process forces the ramp allocations and
routing to be modified frequently. Unplanned aircraft moves are expensive and
propagate queuing congestion and more moves. Therefore, it is necessary to
develop a Rapid Ramp Reconfiguration Plan (RRRP). Ontology models allow the
language of the planner to be harmonized with the language of the simulation
analyst to speed model development. Simulation based planning is useful to
mitigate the impact of “discovered work” by enabling the evaluation of and
best selection from thousands of potential ramp resource allocation scenarios.
Using Ontologies for Simulation
Integration
Perakath Benjamin, Kumar Akella, and Ajay Verma (KBSI)
Abstract:
This paper describes the motivations, methods, and
solution concepts for the use of ontologies for simulation model integration.
Ontological analysis has been shown to be an effective initial step in the
construction of intelligent systems. However, the modeling and simulation
community has not taken advantage of the benefits of ontology management
technology. Moreover, the popularity of semantic technologies and the semantic
web has provided several beneficial opportunities for the modeling and
simulation communities of interest. The paper outlines the technical
challenges in simulation integration and describes an ontology-based method
that addresses these challenges. An example military combat simulation
application scenario is used to illustrate the practical benefits of the
simulation model integration approach.
Wednesday 10:30:00 AM 12:00:00 PM
Ontology-Based Interoperability
II
Chair: John Miller (University of Georgia)
Using Meta-level Ontology Relations to Measure
Conceptual Alignment and Interoperability of Simulation
Models
Levent Yilmaz (Auburn University)
Abstract:
Engineering large and complex simulation systems is
becoming more reliant on the reuse of existing simulation models. While
existing technical standards facilitate syn-tactic and technical
interoperability among disparate simulation models, there is still lack of
formal methods that enable sound reasoning about the conceptual congruity of
models that are selected for composition. This paper suggests a
graph-theoretic approach to measure the extent of conceptual congruity of
models within a new context. The premise of the approach is based on having
contextualized models that provide introspective access to their metamodels. A
metamodel associated with a reusable model entails a conceptualization of the
domain in which it is originally designed to be situated in. The metamodels
are used to instantiate a metagraph and graph distance metrics are used to
measure the alignment of metamodels in the context of the new application
domain.
Conceptual Modeling of Information Exchange
Requirements Based on Ontological Means
Andreas Tolk (Old Dominion
University) and Charles D. Turnitsa (Virginia Modeling Analysis &
Simulation Center)
Abstract:
Unambiguous definition of the information exchanged
between distributed systems is a necessary requirement for simulation system
interoperability. The ontological spectrum categorizes ontological means and
shows the various degrees of support from recovery and discovery to reasoning.
These means are highly applicable in support of data engineering to define
information exchange requirements and therefore can increase interoperability.
If the systems interfaces and resulting information exchange requirements are
captured using the appropriate metadata, these ontological means can be
furthermore applied to unambiguously identify exchangeable information. This
allows systems to exchange information based on self-organizing principles
using what they can exchange and not on mandated specifications of what they
should exchange.
From Domain Ontologies to Modeling Ontologies to
Executable Simulation Models
Gregory A. Silver, Osama M. Al-Haj
Hassan, and John A. Miller (University of Georgia)
Abstract:
Ontologies allow researchers, domain experts, and
software agents to share a common understanding of the concepts and
relationships of a domain. The past few years have seen the publication of
ontologies for a large number of domains. The modeling and simulation
community is beginning to see potential for using these ontologies in the
modeling process. This paper presents a method for using the knowledge encoded
in ontologies to facilitate the development of simulation models. It suggests
a technique that establishes relationships between domain ontologies and a
modeling ontology and then uses the relationships to instantiate a simulation
model as ontology instances. Techniques for translating these instances into
XML based markup languages and into executable models for various software
packages are also presented.