|
WSC 2008 Final Abstracts |
Monday 10:30:00 AM 12:00:00 PM
Modeling for Analysis
Chair:
Sheldon Jacobson (University of Illinois)
Analytical Simulation Modeling
Lee
Schruben (University of California, Berkeley)
Abstract:
Simulation modeling methodology research and simulation
analysis methodology research have evolved into two nearly separate fields. In
this paper, ways are shown how simulation might benefit from modeling and
analysis becoming more closely integrated. The thesis of this paper is that
simulation analysis and simulation modeling methodologies, considered
together, will result in important advancements in both. Some examples
demonstrate how dramatically more efficient discrete event simulation models
can be designed for specific analytical purposes, which in turn enable more
powerful analytical procedures that can exploit the special structures of
these models. A series of increasingly difficult analytical problems, and
models designed to solve them, are considered: starting with simple
performance estimation, and progressing to dynamic multiple moment response
surface meta-modeling.
Monday 1:30:00 PM 3:00:00 PM
The Mathematics of Continuous Simulation
Optimization
Chair: Stephen Chick (INSEAD)
The Mathematics of Continuous-Variable
Simulation Optimization
Sujin Kim (National University of
Singapore) and Shane G. Henderson (Cornell University)
Abstract:
Continuous-variable simulation optimization problems
are those optimization problems where the objective function is computed
through stochastic simulation and the decision variables are continuous. We
discuss verifiable conditions under which the objective function is continuous
or differentiable, and outline some key properties of two classes of methods
for solving such problems, namely sample-average approximation and stochastic
approximation.
Monday 3:30:00 PM 5:00:00 PM
Incorporating Information into Military
Simulations
Chair: Young Jun-Son (University of Arizona)
Incorporating Information Networks Into Military
Simulations
Darryl K. Ahner (United States Military Academy),
Jonathon K. Alt and Francisco K. Baez (U.S. Army TRADOC Analysis Center), John
Jackson (U.S. Joint Forces Command J9) and Thorsten Seitz and Susan M. Sanchez
(Naval Postgraduate School)
Abstract:
Information superiority is considered a critical
capability for future joint forces. As advances in technology continue to
boost our ability to communicate in new and different ways, military forces
are restructuring to incorporate these technologies. Yet we are still limited
in our ability to measure the contributions made by information networks. We
describe three recent studies at the Naval Postgraduate School that involve
information networks. First, we examine a simulation model expanded from a
two-person, zero-sum game to explore how information superiority contributes
to battlefield results and how sensitive it is to information quality. Second,
we examine how network-enabled communications affect the logistics operations
in a centralized receiving and shipping point. The results are intended to
provide operational insights for terminal node operations within a sustainment
base. Third, we explore how social networks might be incorporated into
agent-based models representing civilian populations in stability operations.
Tuesday 8:30:00 AM 10:00:00 AM
Revenue Management
Chair: Osman
Balci (Virginia Tech)
Revenue Management: Models and
Methods
Kalyan T Talluri (ICREA and Universitat Pompeu Fabra),
Garrett J van Ryzin (Columbia University), Itir Z Karaesmen (University of
Maryland) and Gustavo J Vulcano (New York University)
Abstract:
Revenue management is the collection of strategies and
tactics firms use to scientifically manage demand for their products and
services. The practice has grown from its origins in airlines to its status
today as a mainstream business practice in a wide range of industry areas,
including hospitality, energy, fashion retail, and manufacturing. This article
provides an introduction to this increasingly important subfield of operations
research, with an emphasis on use of simulation. Some of the contents are
based on excerpts from the book The Theory and Practice of Revenue Management
(Talluri and van Ryzin 2004a), written by the first two authors of this
article.
Tuesday 10:30:00 AM 12:00:00 PM
Model Validation and Verification
Chair: K. White (University of Virginia)
Verification and Validation of Simulation
Models
Robert G. Sargent (Syracuse University)
Abstract:
In this paper we discuss verification and validation of
simulation models. Four different approaches to deciding model validity are
described; two different paradigms that relate verification and validation to
the model development process are presented; various validation techniques are
defined; conceptual model validity, model verification, operational validity,
and data validity are discussed; a way to document results is given; a
recommended procedure for model validation is presented; and model
accreditation is briefly discussed.
Tuesday 1:30:00 PM 3:00:00 PM
Approximate Zero Variance Simulation
Chair: Marvin Nakayama (NJIT)
Approximate Zero-Variance
Simulation
Pierre L'Ecuyer (DIRO, Université de Montréal) and Bruno
Tuffin (IRISA / INRIA)
Abstract:
Monte Carlo simulation applies to a wide range of
estimation problems, but converges rather slowly in general. Variance
reduction techniques can lower the estimation error, sometimes by a large
factor, but rarely change the convergence rate of the estimation error. This
error usually decreases as the inverse square root of the computational
effort, as dictated by the central limit theorem. In theory, there exist
simulation estimators with zero variance, i.e., that always provide the exact
value. The catch is that these estimators are usually much too difficult (or
virtually impossible) to implement. However, there are situations, especially
in the context of rare-event simulation, where the zero-variance simulation
can be approximated well enough to provide huge efficiency gains. Adaptive
versions can even yield a faster convergence rate, including exponential
convergence in some cases. This paper gives a brief overview of these methods
and discuss their practicality.
Tuesday 3:30:00 PM 5:00:00 PM
Inside Discrete-Event Simulation
Chair: Levent Yilmaz (Auburn)
Inside Discrete-Event Simulation Software: How
it Works and Why it Matters
Thomas J. Schriber (University of
Michigan) and Daniel T. Brunner (Kiva Systems, Inc.)
Abstract:
This paper provides simulation practitioners and
consum-ers with a grounding in how discrete-event simulation software works.
Topics include discrete-event systems; entities, resources, control elements
and operations; simulation runs; entity states; entity lists; and entity-list
management. The implementation of these generic ideas in AutoMod, SLX, and
Extend is described. The paper con-cludes with several examples of “why it
matters” for modelers to know how their simulation software works, including
coverage not only of AutoMod, SLX, and Extend, but also of SIMAN (Arena),
ProModel, and GPSS/H.
Wednesday 8:30:00 AM 10:00:00 AM
COTS Simulation Package
Interoperability
Chair: Paul Sanchez (NPS)
Guidelines for Commercial Off-the-Shelf Simulation
Package Interoperability
Simon J. E. Taylor (Brunel University),
Stephen J. Turner (Nanyang Technological University) and Steffen Strassburger
(Ilmenau University of Technology)
Abstract:
Commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) Simulation Packages
(CSPs) are widely used visual interactive modeling environments such as
Arena™, Anylogic™, Flexsim™, Simul8™, Witness™, etc. CSP Interoperability (or
distributed simulation) is a technique that allows a simulation to be executed
over several computers or for several simulations running on different
computers to run together. This also relates to simulation languages such as
SLX™ and GPSS/H™. There have been various attempts to interoperate these CSPs,
some with the IEEE 1516 High Level Architecture (HLA). These can be quite
complex and it is easy to loose track of exactly what is occurring between
interoperating CSPs and their models. This paper introduces a set of
Interoperability Reference Models (IRMs), or design patters for CSP
Interoperability, that can be used as guidelines to simplify the
interoperability process.
Wednesday 10:30:00 AM 12:00:00 PM
Approximate Dynamic Programming
Chair: Enver Yucesan (INSEAD)
Approximate Dynamic Programming: Lessons From the
Field
Warren B Powell (Princeton University)
Abstract:
Approximate dynamic programming is emerging as a
powerful tool for certain classes of multistage stochastic, dynamic problems
that arise in operations research. It has been applied to a wide range of
problems spanning complex financial management problems, dynamic routing and
scheduling, machine scheduling, energy management, health resource management,
and very large-scale fleet management problems. It offers a modeling framework
that is extremely flexible, making it possible to combine the strengths of
simulation with the intelligence of optimization. Yet it remains a sometimes
frustrating algorithmic strategy which requires considerable intuition into
the structure of a problem. There are a number of algorithmic choices that
have to be made in the design of a complete ADP algorithm. This tutorial
describes the author's experiences with many of these choices in the course of
solving a wide range of problems.